I believe we should measure
children as a whole on what is considered normal development. Children should
be assessed using a general test specializing in identifying if a child is on
pace with the developmental standards, exhibiting any signs of delays. I do not
recommend standard test such as an IQ or an ACT test. These test measure beyond
the normal standards of normal development. The sole purpose of these test
should be personal verses required by government or state. In the state of Ohio
in order to gain admission into college you have to take either the ACT or SAT,
the focus here is testing in early childhood but not every student excel at
test taking. During early childhood the assessments required depends on what
type of program the child is placed. If he/she is enrolled into a learning
center funded by the Child Care Development Fund they requirements my different
from a private funded learning center. All the feral and state funded programs
here in the US has a comprehensive assessment across board. The type of assessment
and what is measured depending on age begins to specify state to state. And
next we can narrow down from learning center to learning center. Although there
is a comprehensive assessment on the federal level. The true assessments
children are measured on is state level or education center level.
Early childhood education and school
age children in Japan are awarded with a great education. Fun, creative
thinking, creative teaching and loving teachers all the words describing an
excellent education system. Assessment or standardized testing begins in junior
high school, at this time school curriculum, teaching styles and parents focus
switches to test preparation. This same practice has been repeated for so many years
the Japanese culture are remiss on changing. The same assessment is admistred
to each student to determine their future.
There
are no test available currently in the US to equally measure development. If
research lacks the ability to formulate a measure for learning disabilities,
how can they formulate a measure to go beyond the normal standards? What do we
consider normal? Multiple intelligence addresses no human excels in all areas
of intelligence (Berger 2012).
No comments:
Post a Comment